Add new comment

U.S.-China Trade Dispute

Matthew Strauss's picture

Accident or not 

Whether by design or accident, the trade negotiations between the U.S. and China took a turn for the worse a few weeks ago. Were it not for the subsequent tweets, comments and actions by both countries, one could have dismissed the early-May breakdown in talks as a hiccup or simply negotiation tactics. But as it stands, it seems increasingly likely the U.S.-China dispute is not going to be resolved any time soon. Unlike last year, when China went out of its way to re-engage the U.S. after the Trump administration threatened and eventually implemented higher tariffs, Chinese officials responded much more combative this time around. 

Why the surprise

The deeper issues, such as intellectual property protection, technology transfer and access, compliance monitoring of any agreement, the removal of tariffs and the definition of an “equal playing field,” were never going to be resolved within a few months. However, there was the hope that some agreement on trade might soon be forthcoming with a commitment to continue dialogue on the outstanding issues. Comments from both sides up to the end of April not only suggested that the latter was possible, but also that it was the most likely outcome. These assumptions were shattered by a single tweet as the U.S. walked away from the negotiation table – and wrong-footed a complacent market. 
 
Market reaction

Chinese equities sold off aggressively, dragging down emerging market equities in general. The U.S. market, on the other hand, remained surprisingly resilient, reflecting: 

• Optimism that some sort of deal will be reached in the near future. Anecdotally, it is interesting to note that U.S. investors are more optimistic on a near-term outcome than investors in Asia. A recent J.P. Morgan global survey indicated that only a quarter of investors surveyed believe Phase III tariffs (i.e., tariffs on the remaining US$300 billion) will be implemented. Half of respondents still think a deal is possible, with 27% seeing a deal being struck in late June. 
• The hope that the impact on the U.S. economy would be minimal and inflationary pressures resulting from the higher tariffs would be manageable in the current low inflation environment.
• The belief that the U.S. Federal Reserve put is firmly in place and any major disruption to the economy or markets will be met by interest rate cuts and possibly even renewed quantitative easing. The market is already pricing in at least 50 basis points (bps) of cuts in interest rates in the U.S. over the next 13 months, and the U.S. 10-year bond yield has plunged 30 bps in recent weeks to 2.30%, from a high of 3.26% in October 2018.* (*
Source: Bloomberg L.P.)

Key developments since the breakdown in talks

All indicators are pointing to increased rather than decreased tensions: 

• The threat of a 25% tariff on an additional US$300 billion of Chinese imports.
 Huawei restrictions.  
• Possibility of restriction on Chinese surveillance companies.
• Renminbi weakness.
 Hawkish and non-conciliatory comments from both sides.
• Bipartisan support in the U.S. for “being tough” on China. There are huge differences as to what that implies but, ahead of next year’s U.S. election, no presidential candidate wants to be accused of “being soft” on China. 

The way forward

Between tweets by U.S. President Donald Trump and the lack of clear insights into the views of China’s Politburo Standing Committee, predicting the eventual outcome is a mug’s game, but given the deep-rooted differences between and frustration on both sides, especially from the hawkish camps within both administrations, the path forward looks increasingly challenged. Thus, following the developments on the dispute remains essential for fund positioning, especially given the profoundly different market impact of a near-term resolution versus a drawn-out and escalating dispute. 
 
Outlook and pointers

The tech fallout worries us even more than the trade fallout: 

• The decision to proceed with additional tariffs (negative) and a potential meeting between Trump and China President Xi Jinping (positive) during the G20 gathering later in June. 
• Increase in the “Technology Cold War.” This is a much more complex issue due to integrated supply chains but also a much more sensitive issue than trade for both countries. This is the true battle ground for the future and both countries know it.
• More regulations and motions passed in the U.S. to limit or curtail Chinese businesses in general.
• Chinese retaliation.
• Chinese yuan renminbi. The currency remains a great neutralizer of tariffs, but any meaningful weakness in the renminbi will send emerging market currencies into a tailspin. Just last night, the U.S. Commerce Department reported it would expand its capabilities to punish countries who are deemed to be “currency manipulators.”
• Any softening in the tone from politicians or policy-makers from either country.
• The economic impact. This is the one aspect that investors are not willing to fully price in yet as it will have dire consequences for risk assets. For the International Monetary Fund, many economists and policy-makers, the negative fallout from an unresolved U.S.-China trade dispute remains one of the bigger, if not the biggest, risks for continued global economic growth. 

Our positioning

Even before the latest fallout, in most of the Signature equity and balanced funds we had been reducing our exposure to technology and some economic-sensitive sectors. Cash in the funds has been creeping higher and was increased even further following the fallout. 
 
This is not the time to hold on to wishful thinking but neither to be dragged into the doomsday hole. This is a time to be informed, to be nimble and not to be blinded by the unexpected. 
 
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS  
The opinions expressed in the communication are solely those of the author and are not to be used or construed as investment advice or as an endorsement or recommendation of any entity or security discussed. Individuals should seek the advice of professionals, as appropriate, regarding any particular investment. Investors should consult their professional advisors prior to implementing any changes to their investment strategies. 

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. The contents of this piece are intended for informational purposes only and not to be used or construed as an endorsement or recommendation of any entity or security discussed. The information should not be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice, and should not be relied upon in that regard. Individuals should seek the advice of professionals, as appropriate, regarding any particular investment. Investors should consult their professional advisors prior to implementing any changes to their investment strategies. These investments may not be suitable to the circumstances of an investor. Some conditions apply. 

Certain statements contained in this communication are based in whole or in part on information provided by third parties and CI Investments Inc. has taken reasonable steps to ensure their accuracy. Market conditions may change which may impact the information contained in this document. Certain statements in this document are forwardlooking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” or “estimate,” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained herein are based upon what CI Investments Inc. and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, neither CI Investments Inc. nor the portfolio manager can assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 
 
CI Investments and the CI Investments design are registered trademarks of CI Investments Inc. Signature Global Asset Management and Signature Funds are trademarks of CI Investments Inc. Signature Global Asset Management is a division of CI Investments Inc. 
 
© CI Investments Inc. 2019. All rights reserved. “Trusted Partner in Wealth” is a trademark of CI Investments Inc. 
 
Published May 29, 2019. 
 
 

We welcome your comments and questions for the Signature team and will respond as soon as possible. Please note that all comments are reviewed for their relevance to the topics discussed in the blog, and that comments may be edited.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.